One evidence record. Different decision contexts.
A governance rating should preserve a consistent evidence base while allowing different users to interpret the signal for their own responsibilities. The underlying opinion does not become an investment recommendation, insurance loss estimate, legal compliance opinion or procurement approval simply because a different audience uses it.
Boards
Oversight, material deficiencies, risk appetite and governance trajectory.
Investors
Operating discipline, material AI exposure and comparable governance maturity.
Insurers
Control evidence, change triggers, monitoring and bounded risk context.
Government
Public accountability, rights, records, transparency and lifecycle control.
Interpret the rating within its limits
Decision users should confirm scope, methodology version, evidence period, unresolved conditions, validity and any material-change triggers before relying on a rating. A rating is one governance signal within a broader diligence and assurance process.